We would like to see your comments on whether the Dead could and should continue to tour as a band. Subjects which might be addressed might include if and how Jerry could be replaced; should the band change its name; musicians to recruit; changes in touring; the band's repertoire. Posted 4/21/96.
let it grow - beth (beth@bluemoon.net)
let it grow into something new. You can't bring back the Dead, don't even try. Go on to the next stage.
The natural order of the universe is change ;)
They should have planned for this before Jerry died. - cooper (cooper@electricvillage.com)
I always felt the Dead should have started using more opening acts on tour, to give it a Furthur Festival atmosphere with the Dead as the headliner. That way the Dead could have eventually backed out without losing the consistency of the show. The openers would continue touring as the Further Festival ad infinitum, adding new acts whenever one drops out. As it is now, the Further Festival won't go on forever since most of the acts are aging anyway. get Zero in there! Stackabones! David Nelson Band! The Radiators! Even Phish!
I think that The Grateful Dead should keep touring. - Julie (Julsar1@aol.com)
I think that The Dead should keep touring. Although I agree to the fact that Jerry was "the heart of the band," I do also believe that Jerry wouldn't have wanted the music to stop on his account. I believe that he would be miserable knowing that the music stopped because of him. I think that it would be more of an honor, than a disgrace to his memory. He, of all people, would not want us grieving his passing by ending the concerts. Jerry said...."If you get confused, listen to the music play." How can we now? Sure, we can listen to tapes, but we can all agree that the only way to truly "feel" the music is to hear it live. I want to dance and shake my bones again!!
The sky was yellow and the sun was blue - Wharf Rat (altlaw@asupernet.com)
I think that all of life is an evolution, one that means each life form constantly changes and evolves in it's own way. The Dead are no different, when Pig died, the band went from a acid blues band to something more country, and then when Keith and Donna left and Brent joined, it again evolved, same with Vince. I've been going to Dead, Bobby and the Midnights and Jerry Band shows since 1978 and, to tell you the truth, most of the shows in the 90's were weak. Every day is a Dead day in our house, with tapes being played from 1966-87, so to me, my best memories are of the days when Jerry had his voice and chops down cold. The Dead are in all of our heads and the way we live our lives, just like when they were touring. Considering I'd see 4-7 shows a year, this meant that for 340+ days a year, the tunes all hummed in my brain. But the 90's were no fun, tickets were a hassle and the crowds were too big and had grown into a monster. Despite that, I still went to a lot of shows. So, to sum up, the Dead are over and they're not. It all depends on your perspective. But there are lots of other guitar players out there who play in the "Jerry" style and could fit in quite nicely. I guess it's really up to the band. But for me, I'm totally satisfied with my family, memories, friends and tapes. Party on.
The Grateful Dead Will Never be the Same - Ryan (captain_trips_@hotmail.com)
I agree the band itself should still tour, but only in memory of our beloved Jerry. The group itself could never play to its full ability without Jerry. Though everyone says that they should replace Jerry, I for one think that's dumb. You cannot replace a man who comitted his life to making the community a happier place, who devoted his every minute to making people happy.
I also think that without Jerry, the rest of the group wouldn't be as inspired and maynot preform to their best capabilites, however this is only a thought.
So if the Gratefu Dead was to keep on playing, I think it would be good too keep up with Robert Hunters lyrics. Robert Hunter devoted his time to writing inspiring lyrics and touching the heart's of many deadheads
It really doesn't matter to me, THE DEAD WILL NEVER BE THE SAME AGAIN!
the band must continue without jerry... they must - peter bixby (ahernvt@juno.com)
I really miss a grateful dead concert, even a sloppy one. Without Jerry there is no
the band must continue without jerry... they must - peter bixby (ahernvt@juno.com)
I really miss a grateful dead concert, even a sloppy one. Without Jerry there is no Dead, but I can't help but miss the others. We all know there were nights when Phil took over on lead bass, and it was just as incredible as when he and Jerry were making it happen in a team way. I say that they can do it without any replacement guitar player, or even Jerrys songs. On a hot night it didn't matter what song they played, because the flow takes over and the Dead become the living vehical for the flow. I thank you for reading my opinion, and I hope to donate more. Later-Bye
the band must continue without jerry... they must - peter bixby (ahernvt@juno.com)
I really miss a grateful dead concert, even a sloppy one. Without Jerry there is no Dead, but I can't help but miss the others. We all know there were nights when Phil took over on lead bass, and it was just as incredible as when he and Jerry were making it happen in a team way. I say that they can do it without any replacement guitar player, or even Jerrys songs. On a hot night it didn't matter what song they played, because the flow takes over and the Dead become the living vehical for the flow. I thank you for reading my opinion, and I hope to donate more. Later-Bye
The Flame Still Burns. Jerry's gone but the Dead must live. - Patti Lord (patlord@eces.org.eg)
I'm still tore up over Jerry, as I know you are. I guess we always will be. He was fabulous and unique, and I continue to thank the Force that he was here. I revere him in an inexplicable way. In this forum, I know I don't have to elaborate on this. But he was not the whole of the Dead, and I want the show to go on in any way it can. I went to the Further Festival in Irvine in 1996, and it was grand. In fact, it was a great comfort to me, a great reaffirmation. Frankly, I think that anyone who does not want the Dead to carry on without Jerry has missed the point. We should endeavor to keep it all alive, however we can. I would welcome and support anything any of the Dead family does, together, in joint ventures, new regroupings, as well as separately. But of course, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts, and the closer they appear in the original format, the better, the far far better. The void(!) left by Jerry's departure cannot be filled, but it can workably be reduced or diffused if the family has the will to let the show go on. I don't know enough about the music scene to be of much help in suggesting someone to be lead guitarist (at the very least) for the band. Mark Knopfler comes to mind, because of his talent, love of country music and rock'n'roll, among other things. He seems from a distance to be hip and in the groove, but I don't know enough about him to be sure. If the band does carry on, perhaps the name could be modified, but I wouldn't like to see an altogether different name. To summarize, I don't see why the show shouldn't go on. I mourn Jerry while I have to accept his departure. Death don't have no mercy. It doesn't mean, however, that the Dead can't live. We all know that if you put those guys up on a stage together--Bobby, Phil, Bill, Mickey, one of their fabulous keyboardists, and any other musicians of their choice--we would all be right there with them, we'd be right back in the zone and Jerry would be there too somehow. So how could anyone say that it's not the Grateful Dead, and that it shouldn't be? I hope this debate is still ongoing. I only found this site lately! Thank you for your efforts to keep the spirit alive. I'll be talking to you again soon! All the very best to all of you. Patti
The Grateful Airplane - Mark Stephens (buds@io.com)
Basically, what we need is to get a guitarist who can play with the Dead but who also has the lysergic "energy" of growing up in San Fran in the 1960s. To me, this can only be Jorma. When he joins the band, the strands of magic energy that began to be spun into musical fabric as the bands headlined together in the 60s will entertwine into a new tapestry of special energy. We can call the new band the "Grateful Airplane." and when they tour, high consciousness will again be seen in America.
Remember Jerry
ms
Should the Dead tour as the Dead - Dustin Roe (roed@coral.indstate.edu)
This is something that I never really put much thought into, untill last month when I went out to see the Further Fest at Deer Creek. The show was rolling along slowly, then to the suprise of everyone (I think), the name Robert Hunter was announced as the next performer. He came on and beautifuly sang Mr. Charlie, Days Between, Down the Road, Terrapin Station, and one more that just now got away from me. Anyway, it was so magical (especialy Days Between), and so perfect, and I started thinking, what if Phil and the rest of the boys were up there baking him up? THAT would be the band called the Grateful Dead that I would go see.
Dustin Roe
Why the hel SHOULDN'T the Dead tour? - Walter Five (walter5@brewich.com)
Well? Why the hel not? It's not as if there's a shortage of "pick-up" guitarists and musicians to fill in with the boys--Carlos Santana, Bob Dylan, Dickey Betts, Country Joe, Elvin Bishop, Jorma, man, the list of "friends of the band" just goes on and on! We carried on without the Pig, we carried on when T.C. left, when Keith & Donna left, when Mickey left there for a while, without Brent...now perhaps they'd want to ressurrect another line-up, like Ace, or Kingfish,or Mickey and the Hartbeats, perhaps as the Bob Weir Band, or Intrepid Trips Inc. for that matter!!! Fact of the matter is, the music needs to be played, and the message still needs to be spread!
...keep on playin' in the band!
Peace through music - Greyson (gmurdoff@gladstone.uoregon.edu)
I think the remaining members of the Dead should do what it is they feel is best. My one request is that they continue to reach out to people with their music: don't stop those feet from tappin' and those hearts from thumpin'! It would also be nice if they (the "living Dead") would throw open the doors to the vault and release a flood of history... but that's another story. Peace.
The Grateful Dead could tour again - Brian Lundquist (lb1488@wheeler.northland.edu)
The Dead could tour again and it would by fine by me. The crutial point is that Jerry could never be replaced. His lead guitar was the glue that held together the dead's greatest moments, and he was often the catalist for truly epic musical moments. The dead could tour again without Jerry, but they would be essentially a completely different band. It would be similar to the musical changes the dead went through after Pigpen's death, but much more extreme. I'd be interested to see what the new chemistry of the band would be like, but, cause I'm a big Jerry fan, I probably wouldn't like it as much.
Going with the flow..... - Tammy Swartzwelder (Bssgrl@aol.com)
The death of Jerry has made us all contemplate whether or not the Grateful Dead could or should go on, but let's remember a few things from our history of the band, although Jerry became the main influential figure of the band, it was not always that way. In fact it was Pigpen who was essentially the leader in the beginning. What it really boils down to is that the magic of this band was reliant upon the ability to face any variety of situations and react upon them in no way that any other group of people could consistently. I feel that as long as the players have the want and desire to continue to perform that they should do so, there cannot be anyone who can "replace" Jerry, he was too special in many ways, but there are people who can fill the void that he has left behind to all of us.The one person that I personally feel that could accomplish this difficult task would be Jorma, he is a musician's musician. And as far as what they would or should call themselves well who would really care if it were to happen? It would just be great to be back together again!
Giong With The Flow......... (continued) - Tammy Swartzwelder (Bssgrl@aol.com)
The only person I feel that could fill the void that has been left behind is Jorma, He's a musician's musician. And as far as what they should call themselves... well who really cares, as long as they're playing that's all that really matters!
Robert Hunter with the boys on New Years' 1999 - Albion M. Butters (amb103@columbia.edu)
Regarding whether the band should tour? How could the Grateful Dead even hope to tour without Jerry? I, for one, do not subscribe to the consensus reality that he is really gone. This is a multi-layered onion/paradox, of course, but in the stolen face of shows meeting dream, there is no doubt that Dead shows retain (even through tapes) an alchemical quality as regards our collective relationship with old Mr. Death.
As for a very special show here and there, there is one person that actually COULD give the proper tone to songs we have come to know as only Jerry could give. That, of course, is Robert Hunter. I love his solo shows, where the songs are full of the flavor which makes them magic. And Bob can CERTAINLY play lead! He only had a master-teacher for 30 years. Just a humble suggestion...
It would be very "closed minded" to think that the Dead couldn't continue - Quicksand (gbpkrs1@bellsouth.net)
Over the course of time many members of the Grateful Dead have passed onto a higher form of conciseness. "The Band Played On." Out of respect for Jerry maybe they should change the name of the band, but the music should never stop!! How about calling the new band "Dark Star."
Do it for Jerry !
Jerry wouldn't have left us if we weren't ready - Dave Scinto (DScinto@Compuserve.com)
It was all about the confluence of energies, whirling in the universe, forming, unforming, reforming and shooting off into a thousand directions at once. Was it a band? Was it a show? Or was it just WAS? Like all moments, it's gone and will never be back, but also will never be like the moments to come. Forms change, bands change, names change, people change, but he Dead and Jerry are now stuck like flies in amber, existing only in memory and recorded sounds of the past, dead history, Dead history. Time to move. Time to go on. Time to remember never to forget. Thanx boyz. See ya somewhere else....
Maybe The Boys Should Give It One More Final Shot... - Kyle Kubiak (klausiien@warwick.net)
To be completely honest, I unfortunately never got to a dead show. I saw my first show of any kind (a Phish show)in '95. I wish that I never saw that show , so I could have hit the Giants Stadium show that year. I am forever saddened by missing my chance, so here is what I think the boys should do:
Furthur is great, but it is not the Dead. The chemisty of the players is different and not as satisfying. Sure Bobby and Mickey are there and Phil shows up in CA, but I want the real deal. We all do.
The Dead should reform for one tour to close the door. To clean the wounds. To show us that they really can't go on without the Master. They should put someone like David Grisman in the lead spot, but keep the ideal of Jerry alive and well. Bring Hornsby back. Put Phil in the spotlight as a true lead player. Make Bobby the showman again. And the Rhythm devils... rock solid as always. I really think Grisman could do it the most justice. He is a bluegrass player like Jerry. They shared so many musical treasures together. He is the man, with his little mandolin, who could do the most justice. He is part of the family and should sub for one last tour.
No on could ever replace Jerry. That is not what we want anyway. We want to see those men return to the stage to blow our minds while they still can. And I feel they still can. After all... they have Phil.
Absolutely Not!! - Richard Barrett (barrett-@webtv.net)
Not that it would matter if the "Dead" did tour again. The magic is over. The Grateful Dead without Jerry Garcia is like an Elvis concert without Elvis.
Yes....No....Maybe....But here's an idea! - Canyon Rick (Nankoweap@yahoo.com)
If the rest of the band want to do some shows, I'd definitely go see 'em! They were always there for us, so I'd be there for them, if they chose to continue. They still have a lot of music to make. BUT,no! there's no way they could go on as if nothing had happened. SO---here's my idea for maybe a few shows: A lot of good ideas have been advanced (Dylan, Santana, etc), but I'd like to hear Willie Nelson do a few shows sometime. Wouldn't Candyman, Dire Wolf, Must Have Been the Roses, etc. sound fantastic?! Sure--not all the songs would work; and not all of Willie's songs would be right either. But, he's someone with the right temperment, the right lifestyle (!), and the right voice. Think about it!!
We Will Survive! - Rose (rose@pcmagic.net)
Hey now!! What do you mean the show's over? After reading a number of responses to this question i am shocked to see so many deadheads respond in such a negative and pessimistic way to evolution!!! What happened to we will survive?? We used to stand strong against a world of corruption, of greed, hatred and war..And now, our father has gone to a better place, and we give that love and laughter up? Madness, i say!! Don't you want to go to a show? Everytime i play a kind tape from a show i am itching to jsut take off and find where all the brothers and sisters have gone. Evolution is a natural part of life...Our friends and family have suffered, some have passed away, but we hold strong - we unite across the world, millions strong in the name of love, laughter, music, trust! Who is to say that the proposed progression of the dead the other one, couldn't lift us from this place of sorrow and pessimism? I say why not!!! To everyone who doubts the continuation of happiness and the shows. Maybe something better or different may evolve - you never know who or what may be inspired if given a chance. Bobby has the ability to make this transformation - he has the gift of lovex, he just has to roll away, the dew!! Any kind people want to keep the music playing, e-mail me - we will survive. Love and peace, rose
The show must go on... - Candace (tela8221@aol.com)
When Jerry first passed on, my initial reaction (as many others felt) was that it was the end of the road for the music we so adored. But with time healing the wounds, I have an increasing urge to revisit the happiness of a spectacular show. Of course, without Jerry, it would not be a Grateful Dead show in its entirety, but I am all for the remaining members to continue on under a different name. This, I have read, will be the case in the summer coming.
I initially feared the let-down of a show not quite Dead Style, but I have enjoyed many other Dead tunes on which Jerry was not lead throughout the years and feel as though these songs could make for a great show all on their own. My fiance was not fortunate enough to have been introduced to the Dead before it was too late, but I would love to take him to a show with the remaining members just so he could get a taste of the life I loved. I am looking forward to a tour, a long-awaited reawakening of the Dead spirit.
FORGE ON!!!!!!! - Michael Wagner (mwagner@pacbell.net)
They shouldn't have missed a beat in '95: they should have and should continue on. How many shows did you see that Bobby carried? Jerry wasn't on board a lot of the time since about, what, 89? 90? Grab Henry Kaiser, that Billy Joel clone with the grand p(Hornsby), Kimmock, fucking go for it. Don't even consider stopping. But train some apprentices, willya???
Furthur 98 - Gandalf (JoshWeil@aol.com)
Well, Ive just seen three Other Ones shows, and am going to see one tomorow, and I must say that I am suitably impressed. Is it the same w/out Jerry? of course not. But it is very, very good. So definately, keep on keepin on, boys
The Dead will always be...Jerry would'a wanted it that way. - Raymond Murray (murrayr@norwich.edu)
The Grateful Dead, as a band, should not spilt and stop touring because of the death of their mislabled frontman. Now don't get me wrong, I love & miss Jerry the same as you folks reading this, but to say the Grateful Dead should cease to be because of his death is something i can't just grip. Jerry, as we all know, lived for the music and the pleasure it brought. I'm sure, beyond any doubt, that he would have demanded that the Grateful Dead "keep on Truckin" in the event something happend to him. As with the death of Pigpen, the Dead should lace up their shoes and keep heading down that Golden Road. Seeing them play as the Other Ones this year brought back memories and friends of Dead Tours of the past. It was like nothing changed. The band played with an energy that took the breath and gave goose bumps to everyone in the crowd. Old friends were everywhere, at every show, and the lot crowd was still doing everything they could to find that perfect something...(somethings never change I guess)...So I hope the Dead keep bringing their thirty years of the best music, and good times to the best bunch of vegi-burrito selling, patchwork wearing, hemp tying family the world has ever seen. HAPPY TRAILS.......Ray Murray ****NOT FADE AWAY****
DO WHAT YOU KNOW BEST! - DAVE DUEWIGER (SPDRACR4@PRODIGY.NET)
11/26/98 Why change the bands name? Why not continue? WHY REALLY? Postions can be filled, but knowone can be replaced. If Jerry or Bob said the hell with it back when Pig Pen kicked it, there would not be the DEAD we all know today.After all it was Pig Pens band back then. They should have quit before they really got started.Perhaps they should have thrown the old towel in when Kieth G. bit it, or Brent. WHY GO ON ? This is what these very talented guys do for a living. This is what they do for life. They got there together ,not on Jerry's back. Lets not be so critical of the residual talent. They will make sure what you will hear will be good enough for those prejudice ears. Trust, have Faith. Jerry was great but, HE was not the Grateful Dead. The dead is . It's very similar to : If someone dies or leaves the N.Y. symphany orchestra, they get replaced. The BAND plays on. You will get comfortable again. Change is good. Great memories, lots of room for future adventure. SEE YA ON THE ROAD!
The Boys with out Jerry - Mark Benz...Syracuse Ny. (Hogan7@aol.com)
Of course they should Keep touring. Bruce Hornsby is phenomenal, and Bobby still sounds like an animal. Besides, it gives all of us Heads a chance to see each other with out having to pretend we're enjoying ourselves at a Phish show. The only problem I have with the Further Fest is that they play ( Although creative and at times inspirational ) certain Jerry tunes that should be left alone. No one has more respect and admiration for Bruce, but I think Scarlett, Wharf Rat, and Dark Star died with Jerry. Maybe I'm old fashioned but when I hear those 2nd Set nuggets all I can think of is where's Papa? Anyways, that's my take. God Bless all deadheads this holiday season, I may not know all of you, but your all family to me.
M.Benz...Syracuse NY
New Name, New Tunes would be great - Mike Bonella (organic@flinthills.com)
Although I greatly miss the Grateful Dead, I don't think the band should continue under the same name. I was at a couple of Further Fest shows this Summer. I felt really sad while I was there mainly because there was something/someone missing. It wasn't right to hear Bruce sing Jerry songs. (no offense Bruce, you are great). I would love to see shows where the band sang traditional Bob and Phil songs, and other new tunes. I don't feel that they should play many of Jerry's songs. It just isn't the same. Guest guitar players would be really cool, maybe Santana, or some other old school guys. I was so glad to see Phil again, and still miss Billy. Please Please Please let me complete my New Years 2000 wish of being at the show to bring in the new millenium. The best part of Further was Saint Steven, Well Done! Mike Bonella
ONLY IF....... - KIP (ROSSNKIP@BWAY.NET)
I belive we need one last hurah! Maybe a short run, maybe a whole tour but most importantly i think the only other folk that should even feel they can fill in should join only the original members(bruce included). Those being hunter, barlow,maybe branford and sittin in for the fat man, why his best bud of course david (dawg), the griss, grisman. I've heard him do jg rifs and such and if you just listen to him, he picks similar. He's got that same magical flow. He'd be the only one i could really see/hear. Check out new disc coming out hopefully this year by dawg's daughter gillian (gg) grisman. Talk about a reminscent flow. Heard a few tracks w/her dad. Those jams sent chills up my spine. Thought i fu*kin ghost of jerry at thier house, just leanin against the fridge. Spooky ya know.
But, as far as fronting as the dead, i think it to be a little too tabu. Dont you? When i heard the news that it was under consideration, i was stunned. Just stood there. I lost all composure. Starring in astonishment at a small group of associates. The silence lasted for at least 2 minutes. The worst of all, this leak came from a secure source. We were at a trade show in vegas of all places. They told me it was cause gdmerch. Was sliding in revenues and it would bolster some bucks.........Baffeled. The boys may have made some serious loot cakes throughout the years but were not founded on a business plan. Now do you think the band wants to go out under the gd name just for $$ or do you think theres some corperate connection. I don't think the boys gotta be the dead to do thier stuff.
-
We Need the "Other Ones" - Jeffrey Halperin (halprino@hotmail.com)
Unfortunately, I never had the opportunity to actually see the band rock the way I have heard them on tape soo many times. The "Other Ones" will give me a chance to see the other gifted members of the band. Jerry was absolutely my favourite guitarist, no question about it. However, I still LOVE all the other band members. I have never seen any of them play live. I would be able to see them now. The Grateful Dead are still the best band, with or without Jerry. I think they should change their name. You could argue and say band members have come and gone, which is true. But, out of respect for Jerry, they should change their name because they are definitely not the same band without him. I think they should play the same songs as before, with more covers and more freestyle jamming. There is never too much jamming. It is always nice to hear a really different cover. I could totally understand if the band stopped touring (although it would be horribly upsetting) since they have been doing it for thirty years. Although I really hope they come to Toronto soon. That's where I live and I don't know how much further I could go to see them. PLEASE COME.
ROCK ON - krista (sweetstuff4@hotmail.com)
I love the dead and i think that if they want to go on with out jerry then its there choice even if i think that jerry made the dead and ther know way even close to being the dead with out jerry . Iam 13 and have gon to more concerts then i can count that high me and jerrys girls were very good friends and so were my brothers and toro my dad worked with the dead so we went to so many shows it was amazing and i will never forget jerry or the dead . So peace love and rock on ferther
LOVE KRISTA SPRING
ALL in ALL......... - jc "sky" freeland (warlokman@hotmail.com)
So the Dead are no longer. Contrary to public worries, four year later and the family is still pretty much intact, and amazingly drawing more people to itself even in the band's absence. Were they ever here at all? It should be no surprise that the force that was "Jerry" was what held held this group of musicians together. By the same...er, toke:), it is only natural that any attempt by the remaining members to stay together was a valient, albeit futile endeavor. But it befuddlez me to hear some interpreting this as some sort of end to the magic they helped expose to us over 30 years. I think it is time for us all to return to our musical roots. We all know that Jerry had a widely varied taste for traditional "American" music, but also for stories, myths, fables and legends. His own ideas evolved from his rich knowlege of all these, seeing connections, and allowing it all to flow through him like water directly to us. I think the only way to touch upon this musical void some feel is to create a constantly changing gathering of musicians from all traditional forms of music, not only American, but world tribal musics as well. Anyone deadicated to the exploration of ideas would be welcomed. Think about it! A nameless band that is in contant flux, always being contributed to by somebody new. This "thing" could then be drawn upon by others to keep exposing the magic:) One person I think is sorely needed in the creation of all of this is David Grisman. Mickey, I think you are our connection to world music. We need to get our minds together, return to the well, fill it up, lower down again, and create a new nameless "something" that would be open to all possibilities. Then each of those musicians could bring what they learned from it into their own band, offering all types of interpretations in the common good:) Thanks for the soapbox, Deadbase! ~Warlok~